Mac World San Fran

by Anand Lal Shimpi on January 11, 2005 3:25 PM EST
Because of the close proximity to CES, I couldn't make it down to Mac World, which is a bit of a shame considering all of the interesting suff that was announced there. Now that some of the announcements have been made I thought I'd chime in on things:

Mac mini

The Mac mini is interesting, especially given how small it is. It's basically Apple's answer to the Shuttle XPC, except a lot smaller. The thing weighs 2.9 lbs and measures 6.5" on all sides (and is only 2" high), it's basically a laptop without the integrated display and reproportioned to maximize desktop space. The specs are quite similar to Apple's PowerBook line - offering either a 1.25GHz G4 or a 1.42GHz G4 as a CPU option. The CPU options are strong enough to be competitive with the Celerons that Dell offers in their equivalently priced systems, but definitely not strong enough to compete with something like a 2.8 - 3.0GHz Pentium 4. Honestly I think the CPU is powerful enough, but where Apple really dropped the ball is on the amount of memory. After extensively using the iMac G5 I found that even on the 1.8GHz 20" model the system is basically bound by memory size more than CPU performance (it only ships with 256MB). The move from 256MB to 512MB in OS X 10.3.7 results in a tremendous reduction in disk swapping, which is very important to the overall user experience and one area where the cheap PCs generally fall behind in.

The price points are higher than I would've liked to have seen them, but honestly $499 and $599 are still competitive. My main complaint here continues to be the memory size. I'd like to see at least the $599 model have 512MB of memory, although I wouldn't want to give up the faster processor for it. Unfortunately for $499 I don't think it will be cheap enough for PC users to pick up as a secondary system; an OS X experiment box if you will. I'd say the limit for that crowd would be $399, although then you could be compromising performance specs which would be detrimental to the idea of giving people a positive OS X experience.

I'm impressed by the integrated DVI output as well as the overall design of the system, which I think give it the edge over competing ultracheap PCs. The Radeon 9200 GPU isn't anything to get excited about, so it won't be a gaming machine, but then again Macs really aren't these days to begin with.

My only other complaint from a personal standpoint are the sizes of the HDDs, I'd like to see a massive HDD size option as this thing would make for a great personal server. It sounds like the Mac mini is using a standard 3.5" IDE HDD, if so, replacing that drive with a larger one shouldn't be a problem... :)

Overall, I think the Mac mini is a positive move for Apple and it looks to be a decent product. I was definitely skeptical of the "cheap Mac" at first, but I can say I'm quite impressed at this stage.

iWork

I've never used Keynote so Keynote 2 looks interesting to me, but there's not much I can talk about there. What truly interests me is Pages - finally a MS Word replacement for OS X. I'd do anything to replace MS Office and Dreamweaver with better native OS X applications on the Mac, while still retaining full functionality. While I'm not so sure about its HTML export capabilities, Pages does look like the application that could rid my Mac of MS Word.

iPod shuffle

I'm not as excited about the iPod shuffle because it is screenless and thus you lose one of the major strengths of the iPod - its interface. That being said, I think including a slider that lets you randomize your music or play it sequentially on the actual unit itself was a very smart move.

I'm not so sure how well organizing your playlists at sync time would work simply because I can see myself forgetting the order over time. That being said, I can also see the music itself being a reminder of the order I put the songs in while I'm actually using the unit.

I'm not much of a flash based MP3 player fan but the iPod shuffle is interesting.

The rest...

The iLife updates are also interesting, but I have yet to try iMovie or iDVD so I can't truly appreciate the updates.

Anyone else have any inputs on the announcements?
Comments Locked

51 Comments

View All Comments

  • mephisto - Monday, January 17, 2005 - link

    #27 Crucial sell direct in Australia too:

    http://www.crucial.com/crucial/pvtcontent/internat...

  • Gil - Monday, January 17, 2005 - link

    My wife is beside herself with excitement for the mini! I will have a LCD monitor with wireless kb, and mouse setup in our kitchen hutch so that she can mess around with digital pictures and surf the web. On top of that, she will not complain about how noisy my four case fans are anymore! Man that thing is cute!...G
  • hopejr - Monday, January 17, 2005 - link

    I put a 256MB PC2700 in my iBook and it flies now! Thanks for the suggestion #37
  • bersl2 - Saturday, January 15, 2005 - link

    Apple has always put less RAM in their machines than a comparable PC. This is no shocker.

    More RAM is always better, but Apple seems to get away with skimping on it.
  • M. Lin - Saturday, January 15, 2005 - link

    In reply to hopejr re iBook RAM:

    Any DDR SO-DIMM marked PC2100 and up will do, so PC2700, which is the most plentiful, is fine.

    In my experience, Macs are NOT picky with RAM. I've mixed all sorts of generics and brand names and never had a problem.

    Search dealram.com for the best prices.
  • CompuNinja - Saturday, January 15, 2005 - link

    I don't understand why there's such a negative reaction to Office 2k4. I think it's far and away the best version of Office MS has ever made, and considering the fact that each product in the suite is the best of it's class that's saying a lot. Word and Excel have loads of features not found in the PC equivalents, and Entourage has a much cleaner interface than Outlook does. They are really top notch, and I've never seen any word processor match Word in terms of ease of use + features (including what I've seen from Pages).

    FYI, iTunes is Carbon, and yes, Carbon runs much faster than Cocoa does.
  • M. T. MacPhee - Friday, January 14, 2005 - link

    Anand! Wanting to get rid of MS apps on your Mac! You really *are* turning into a Machead!
  • ProviaFan - Friday, January 14, 2005 - link

    I'm with #33. Who gives a crap what millions of people out there with too much time on their hands have to say about stuff that they generally don't know much about?

    Anand has earned his respect and reputation, which is why many people who couldn't care less about "blogs," including myself, still take time to read what he has to say.
  • msva124 - Thursday, January 13, 2005 - link

    jsares, the fact that you have a blog gives you instant credibility in my eyes. I read that post you mentioned, it really changed my mind about everything.
  • nowayout99 - Thursday, January 13, 2005 - link

    #28, Apple says it has to be upgraded by a certified tech or the warranty is voided. It's not an easily opened case.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now